I’ve been increasingly curious about something that comes up often in my work with clients: the difficulty of resting, slowing down and finding ease.
Peace. Ease. Lightness. These are the things many clients tell me they want. They want to feel less driven, less caught up in their minds and less stressed by the demands they place on themselves or experience from the world around them.
And yet, they often find it difficult to switch off. Their minds keep working, they feel restless or overstimulated, or they are so exhausted that rest feels out of reach. Even when they have time to themselves, something pulls them back into thinking, doing or seeking stimulation.
They long for ease, yet find it difficult to let themselves experience it.
Why can it feel so uncomfortable to slow down, let go of the need to do or think, and simply be?
This is the question I’ve found myself exploring once again.
The discomfort of slowing down
I hear this from clients, and I notice it in people around me. They finish work but find it difficult to switch off. They have time to themselves but feel compelled to fill it. They sit down to rest, only to pick up their phones, start thinking about tomorrow or find something else that needs doing.
Sometimes the body stops, but the mind carries on.
What makes it so difficult to settle into the very state so many people say they want?
There may be several explanations. Research into stress suggests that worry and repetitive thinking can prolong the body’s stress response, even after the original demand has passed. The working day may be over, but the mind continues to rehearse, anticipate and problem-solve.
Psychology offers another perspective. Sometimes activity becomes a way of avoiding uncomfortable thoughts, feelings or sensations. Keeping busy gives attention somewhere to go. Planning can offer a sense of control. Stimulation can provide temporary relief or offer a quick hit of excitement or reward.
Over time, these responses can become habitual.
Of course, this isn’t the explanation for everyone. Biology, individual differences in attention and arousal, personal histories and current circumstances can all influence our relationship with rest. For some people, differences in neurobiology affect how they regulate attention and respond to low-stimulation activities. For others, learned ways of managing discomfort or feeling safe may be part of the picture.
This isn’t about assuming that everyone should rest in the same way, or that stillness is necessarily the answer. It’s about becoming curious about what makes rest accessible or difficult for each of us.
Is it difficult to slow down? Or is it difficult to be with what happens when we do?
A culture of constant stimulation
Our wider environment makes this worth considering.
Messages, emails, notifications, social media, news, entertainment and endless information are available at any moment. Work follows us home. Even the gaps in our day can be filled with something to watch, read, listen to or respond to.
Boredom can be avoided almost as soon as it appears.
There is nothing inherently wrong with technology or stimulation. But what happens when reaching for something becomes our automatic response whenever there is a pause?
Can we wait without distraction? Walk without listening to something? Sit quietly without feeling the need to pick up a phone?
What happens when nothing is demanding our attention?
Constant stimulation leaves us with fewer opportunities to notice what’s really going on for us: in our bodies, in our emotions, in our inner experience.
And when the activity stops, the quiet can feel less like relief and more like an absence that needs to be filled.
Finding the balance
I don’t think the answer is to eliminate activation. We need it. It gives us energy to work, create, connect, make decisions and respond to life.
But we also need opportunities to step out of it.
Time when there is no requirement to respond, be productive, achieve or solve something.
Space not only to recover from the demands of everyday life, but to reconnect with our capacity to sense, feel and intuit — to listen to what is there beneath the busy, fast-thinking mind.
This doesn’t mean that rest will always feel peaceful. Stillness can bring restlessness, difficult feelings or a mind that seems louder than ever. Nor does rest have to mean sitting in silence. Movement, music, time in nature or an absorbing activity may offer a more accessible route to rest for some people.
The question is whether there is freedom to move between action and rest, or whether the pull towards activity has become so habitual that stepping away feels difficult.
Perhaps the invitation is to notice the difference between activity we consciously choose and that which happens out of habit, without always supporting us.
To discover what happens when there is space.
And to explore what becomes possible when we create that space.
Activation and aliveness
This brings me to another question I’ve been exploring: the distinction between activation and aliveness.
I wonder whether we sometimes mistake one for the other.
A new idea, an interesting challenge, a deadline or a stimulating experience can bring energy, focus and momentum. There is engagement. A sense of being switched on.
But is activation the same as aliveness?
I don’t think so, although the two can certainly coexist.
For me, aliveness has a different quality. It can be vibrant, joyful and full of energy, but it doesn’t depend on having something to respond to or engage with. It can be felt in my body, in connection with another person or the natural world, without needing anything in particular to happen.
There is energy, but it doesn’t need to become action.
Aliveness isn’t something we always need to generate through stimulation. We can access it from within, without needing something outside ourselves to make us feel alive.
I wonder whether, for some people, the intensity of activation becomes so familiar that they find it harder to recognise quieter inner experiences of aliveness. When the intensity subsides, they may mistake the absence of activation for the absence of aliveness itself.
Ease and aliveness are not mutually exclusive.
Stillness doesn’t have to mean the absence of energy. And being fully alive doesn’t have to mean being constantly stimulated.
Experimenting with more ease
So how might we begin to bring more ease into our lives?
I don’t think this is about forcing ourselves to slow down, trying to eliminate activation or turning rest into another thing on our to-do list. It’s an invitation to become curious about our patterns, to experiment with different ways of being, and to meet ourselves with a little more self-compassion along the way.
Here are a few things to experiment with.
- Create small spaces without stimulation. Take a walk without a podcast. Sit with a cup of tea without looking at your phone. Allow a pause without immediately filling it. Notice what happens, without expecting yourself to feel calm.
- Bring your attention back to your body. Notice physical sensations, your breath, tension or energy in your body. Rather than remaining caught in the activity of the thinking mind, explore what becomes available when you pay attention to what you can sense and feel.
- Make space for your emotions. Notice what feelings are present, without immediately trying to solve, change or move away from them. You don’t need to understand everything you feel or do anything about it straight away.
- Notice what genuinely brings you alive. Explore the difference between seeking another stimulating experience and engaging in something that leaves you feeling more connected, energised or alive. Notice what nourishes you, rather than simply what captures your attention.
- Find your own way into rest. Ease doesn’t necessarily mean sitting still or doing nothing. It might come through movement, time in nature, music, creativity or connection with another person. Experiment with what helps you feel more settled, restored or at ease.
There is no single way to rest, and no need to get this right.
The invitation is to approach yourself with curiosity rather than judgement. To notice what happens, to discover what works for you, and to allow yourself the freedom to experiment.
What is your relationship with activation?
Perhaps the aim isn’t to eliminate activation, but to have more choice about when to engage with it and when to step away.
To think without being caught in endless thinking. To engage with stimulation without constantly seeking more. To act when action is needed, and to rest when it isn’t.
We don’t have to choose between being fully engaged with life and being at ease.
I keep returning to the question that started this inquiry.
What is your relationship with activation?
What does it give you? What happens when it falls away? And have you become so accustomed to being activated that you find it difficult to experience ease?

View comments
+ Leave a comment